أثر الانتماء الحزبي على تنظيم القضاء الدستوري في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية

Abstract EN

The constitutional judiciary is highly regarded in countries with contemporary constitutional systems and there are several factors affecting the work of the constitutional judiciary, the most important of which is the political reality of political or partisan affiliation.

Through this study, the researcher has taken from the constitutional judiciary in the United States of America a model on the impact of party affiliation on the effectiveness of constitutional justice in America, where the constitutional judiciary in the United States of America is represented by the Supreme Court of America.

In fact, the U.

S.

Supreme Court was greatly affected by the political conflict between the two major parties in America, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

It has been noted through our research how party affiliation played a role in the formation of the Supreme Court through the mechanism of selecting the judiciary and controlling the composition of the Supreme Court, where the President of America is keen to choose judges with the same ideology as his ideas and the ideas of his party so that he can pass decisions and laws that serve his interests and the interest of his party, not to mention also interfere with the work of the court and determine its terms of reference.