Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques
Author
Source
International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences
Issue
Vol. 7, Issue 1 (31 Jan. 2007)20 p.
Publisher
Ain Shams University Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences
Publication Date
2007-01-31
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
20
Main Subjects
Information Technology and Computer Science
Topics
Abstract EN
In this paper, we compare the performance of key classical and clustering techniques for image segmentation when they are applied on medical and non medical data.
These methods are applied on two different sets: reference images (RI), for objective evaluation based on estimation of segmentation accuracy and time, and non reference images (NRI), for objective evaluation based on combined judgment of opinions of specialists.
A direct benefit of this study is being able to determine the most suitable segmentation techniques for given application medical images.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Zanati, E. A.. 2007. Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences،Vol. 7, no. 1.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-285029
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Zanati, E. A.. Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences Vol. 7, no. 1 (Jan. 2007).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-285029
American Medical Association (AMA)
Zanati, E. A.. Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences. 2007. Vol. 7, no. 1.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-285029
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-285029