Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques

Author

Zanati, E. A.

Source

International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences

Issue

Vol. 7, Issue 1 (31 Jan. 2007)20 p.

Publisher

Ain Shams University Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences

Publication Date

2007-01-31

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

20

Main Subjects

Information Technology and Computer Science

Topics

Abstract EN

In this paper, we compare the performance of key classical and clustering techniques for image segmentation when they are applied on medical and non medical data.

These methods are applied on two different sets: reference images (RI), for objective evaluation based on estimation of segmentation accuracy and time, and non reference images (NRI), for objective evaluation based on combined judgment of opinions of specialists.

A direct benefit of this study is being able to determine the most suitable segmentation techniques for given application medical images.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Zanati, E. A.. 2007. Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences،Vol. 7, no. 1.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-285029

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Zanati, E. A.. Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences Vol. 7, no. 1 (Jan. 2007).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-285029

American Medical Association (AMA)

Zanati, E. A.. Comparison between classical and clustering segmentation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences. 2007. Vol. 7, no. 1.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-285029

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-285029