A comparative study between linear discriminant analysis and multinomial logistic regression

Abstract EN

This paper aimed to compare between the two different methods of classification: linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) using the overall classification accuracy, investigating their quality of prediction in terms of sensitivity and specificity, and examining area under the ROC curve (AUC) in order to make the choice between the two methods easier, and to understand how the two models behave under different data and group characteristics.

Model performance had been assessed from two special cases of the kfold partitioning technique, the ‘leave-one-out’ and ‘hold out’ procedures.

The performance evaluation for the two methods was carried out using real data and also by simulation.

Results show that logistic regression slightly exceeds linear discriminant analysis in the correct classification rate, but when taking into account sensitivity, specificity and AUC, the differences in the AUC were negligible.

By simulation, we examined the impact of changes regarding the sample size, distance between group means, categorization, and correlation matrices between the predictors on the performance of each method.

Results indicate that the variation in sample size, values of Euclidean distance, different number of categories have similar impact on the result for the two methods, and both methods LDA and MLR show a significant improvement in classification accuracy in the absence of multicollinearity among the explanatory variables.