Anti EGFR therapy in the treatment of non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : the current evidence

Joint Authors

Julka, P. K.
Benson, Rony
Mallick, Supriya
Rath, G. K.

Source

Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute

Issue

Vol. 28, Issue 3 (30 Sep. 2016), pp.141-148, 8 p.

Publisher

Cairo University National Cancer Institute

Publication Date

2016-09-30

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for a large oncologic burden in the developing countries.

In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer multimodality treatment is warranted.

Radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy has long been considered the standard for patients with disease involving the oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx.

However, addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy increases treatment related toxicity by many folds and compliance rates decrease.

In this context a systemic therapy, which when used concurrent with radiation with favorable toxicity profile is of great importance for improving disease control in locally advanced HNSCC.

Anti-epithelial growth factor receptor targeted therapy emerged as a potential treatment option.

In recent years many trials were conducted to find the optimum treatment option with the combination of these targeted agents.

The initial trials showed excellent results with minimal morbidity and led to great enthusiasm across the globe to incorporate these regimens as a standard of care.

However, subsequently many trials failed to maintain such results and now there is little agreement to the initial results achieved with these drugs.

Based on the current evidence we cannot recommend the replacement of cisplatin with targeted therapy in concurrent setting.

It may be considered in patients with altered renal parameters, hypersensitivity or intolerance to cisplatin.

The addition of targeted therapy in addition to chemotherapy in the concurrent setting can’t also be recommended as the benefit is doubtful and is associated with a significant increase in toxicity.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Benson, Rony& Mallick, Supriya& Julka, P. K.& Rath, G. K.. 2016. Anti EGFR therapy in the treatment of non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : the current evidence. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute،Vol. 28, no. 3, pp.141-148.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-708739

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Benson, Rony…[et al.]. Anti EGFR therapy in the treatment of non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : the current evidence. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute Vol. 28, no. 3 (Sep. 2016), pp.141-148.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-708739

American Medical Association (AMA)

Benson, Rony& Mallick, Supriya& Julka, P. K.& Rath, G. K.. Anti EGFR therapy in the treatment of non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : the current evidence. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute. 2016. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp.141-148.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-708739

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 146-148

Record ID

BIM-708739